MINDGAMES: AM I THE ONLY PERSON TO HAVE READ THIS NOVEL IN ITS ENTIRETY?
BIG FAT
BOOK, THIN ON CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT AND PLACE DESCRIPTION.
By
Mansor Puteh
Mindgames
by Yang-May Ooi, is set in Malaysia .
But I am here in Malaysia
and have been in most of my life.
But I
can’t figure out which parts of Malaysia
is the author referring to. She maybe Malaysian (I’m not sure of this) but a
Chinese and residing in England .
And what
is mind-boggling is how she could invent things that were not there and creating
states which are not there, to push for her plot into the realm of fantasy
forcing everybody with her words, and sounding unMalaysian and like someone who
tries to be English or western.
What I
hate the most about this novel is how far away from reality the plot and more
so the locations are.
Am I the
only person who has read the novel in its entirety?
This
novel should rightly be set in a totally fictitious country and it would have
done justice to the plot.
The
characters are mostly non-Melayu living in a Malaysia which cannot exist in the
way the author had described it.
And all
the time I read this novel, I can’t fail to realize how unrealistic it is, the Malaysia that I
know and can see even when I was reading the book.
It is
closer to Singapore or Hong
Kong and even Taiwan , but it
cannot be Malaysia ,
and the novel would have become much better.
Setting
it in Japan
won’t be too bad.
Best of
all it if it set in Chinaland, where most of the people are Chinese!
I was
distracted by what I read so much so that I could hardly ever appreciate
whatever that the author is trying to say.
It could
even remind me of the many sci-fi novels and later films that were produced
from them that had been produced by Hollywood
studios in an earlier time.
And it
is not even satire. It could be one. And it also did not come on as an
absurdist novel. It could be one too.
But what
I was not comfortable the most is how the author was imposing herself too much
and trying to impress her imaginary readers in the west by including or
littering so many of the four-letter words wherever she could and also having
homosexuals to spice up her plot, like it could not be created without them.
If
Mindgames is a feature film it deserves an X rating and could not be shown in
the cinemas in Malaysia .
I also
find the characters to be too wooden and unreal for my liking.
And the
sets are all too stagey, with everybody already or almost sitting and appearing
like they are on a stage playing out their roles with limited movement and
business or other activities.
Character
development is lacking as much as scene development. And no one knows how the
Center could have been established in Malaysia without anyone realizing its
presence and why Malaysia was chosen over the other countries especially
Singapore or the Philippines or Thailand where the security breach if it
happens can be allowed to happen.
But not
so in Malaysia
especially if the Center is operated by some English persons with Chinese
collaborators.
And there is also a severe lacking in details of the local scenes and features, so a Malaysian reading the novel can appreciate them, to know that the author is talking about the place and time that the reader who is Malaysian and in the country called Malaysia can also agree to and to take the Malaysian reader along.
But this
did not happen.
I was
lost in the space and time that the author had tried to create with no
historical, cultural and social as well as religious perspectives that I can
relate to.
Kuala
Lumpur the capital city of the country is not given due recognition in the
novel; it is not described well except for it to be as the confluence of two
rivers, which the author had also failed to mention – the Gombak and Kelang
Rivers, where Masjid Jamek, the first mosque in the city was built and where it
still sits.
And that
bothered me a lot as much as the many four-letter words that are littered
everywhere and the description of sexual encounters, especially those between
women.
It is a
fat book no doubt and I like fat books…but the color of the pages had turned
brown in the copy I have which I bought at the bookstore long ago but had
neglected to pick up to read until recently.
The one
thing that also bothered me when I was reading the novel is how the author
drummed what she wanted into the readers without ever allowing them to decide
for themselves what they are reading and who the persons in the story are;
everything is drummed into them and all the characters appear to be what the
author wants.
This is
not fair to the readers who can make that sort of decision for themselves.
If this
had been done and if the author had used a different way of telling a story and
especially to describe the characters to build them, then surely, the novel
could be less trite to read and to comprehend what caused the characters in it
to act in the way they did so that one can feel like they are in full control
of themselves and not guided by the author-goddess.
The ending
is reminiscent of some early Hollywood action films copied also by those
produced in Hong Kong and by Bollywood even to
this day.
What it
means is that it is not original. It could succeed if it is meant to be a
satire. But it wasn’t.
The news
reporting style used by the author is what is coming in the way for the readers
other than what has been described above.
Comments