THE 13 MAY, 1969 INCIDENT HAPPENED BARELY FOUR YEARS AFTER THE COLLAPSE OF THE OLD MALAYAN CINEMA THEN BASED IN JALAN AMPAS, SINGAPORE.
…AND THE
NEED TO CREATE THE NEW MALAYSIAN CINEMA TO OVERCOME THE AFTERSHOCKS THAT ARE
STILL BEING FELT TILL TODAY ONE CREATED BY AN INNOCENT CELLPHONE.
By
Mansor Puteh
Our
historians, psychologists, sociologists, politicians, researchers, think
tankers and other so-called experts may not realize this, but the fact is the
13 May, 1969 Incident happened barely four years after the Old Malayan Cinema
then based in Jalan Ampas in Singapore collapsed.
Sometimes
I wonder if they have done enough to help reshape the thinking of the people
using their respective discipline. Maybe not.
No
wonder the controversies and scandals that we see in the country involving
racial and religious issues as well as social and cultural ones have never been
looked at from their perspectives other than by petty and general analysts only
and other media clowns.
Efforts
to revive it by moving it to Malaysia ,
also at the suggestion of the then Singapore prime minister, Lee Kuan
Yew, failed. The Old Malayan Cinema did not create new voices in the form of
the introduction of new generation of film directors and depending on those who
were once with the studios in Jalan Ampas and East Coast Road in Singapore
proved an utter failure.
The
problem became more acute with the advent of films from Indonesia which
became a rage by the Melayu and non-Melayu.
However,
contradictory efforts by the distributors caused the sudden influx of films
from Taiwan and Hong Kong, many of which were produced by the Shaw Brothers’
studios at Clearwater Bay in the country, that were mostly historical and
costume epics, which gave the Chinese in Malaysia a renewed pride and reconnection
to China, via Hong Kong and the cinema.
The
Indians in Malaysia
too started to be fascinated with the films that were brought in from Chennai
and Mumbai, respectively.
And
American exporters were quick to seize the moment by establishing their own
offices in Malaysia
to distribute their films, whose activities are now undertaken by local
importers and distributors without them even needing to do the chore anymore.
And what
had all this caused in the shaping or reshaping of the minds of the New
Malaysians and Old Malayans of the different races? Plenty.
One
thing’s for certain is that the society had been fractured beyond recognition
and with the economic development which saw the sudden flow of people from
their traditional habitats to the cities and urban areas, surely, some
skirmishes would bound to happen through economic, social and cultural and
sometimes religious discontents, added by political polemics and semantics.
And
diversity can become a bane not boon or not an advantage but a disadvantage.
And when
politicians from the different groups started to become fiery, it did not take
too long for them to get what they had not bargained for, the outbreak of the
13 May, 1969 Incident the aftershocks of which had been felt over the years in
various forms.
But the
latest aftershock that happened was so sudden and totally unexpected that no
one could guess how an ominous cellphone can cause that to happen.
Unfortunately,
with the many historians, psychologists, sociologists, politicians, researchers,
think tankers and other so-called experts that we have in the country with some
of them having gone abroad to study in their respective fields, none of them
had bothered to look at the issue from this perspective.
This is
understandable since none of them sees the cinema as barometer to gauge the
people’s propensities and attitudes, other than to look at it from the point of
view of popular entertainment which it may be not.
And
worse, with the establishment of Finas since 1980, it has not even cared to
look at the matter from this perspective and only cared to encourage the
activity of film production without knowing what a cinema entails and how to
create one that is suited to the present needs of the country.
The New
Malaysian Cinema, must be a cause for the creation of the new Malaysian society
whose members must not be emboldened by alien values and ideas, so that the
propensities that they may have can be curtailed to put focus on the needs of
the society and country and not to be selfishly bound to personal tastes and
dictates only.
It is
also unfortunate that there has never been any discourse in Dewan Rakyat and
Dewan Negara on these matters, because their members are so aloof to the real
use of the cinema that the need for the establishment and development of the
New Malaysian Cinema had simply skipped their attention.
And what
is the most unfortunate is how the government had spent so much money to
develop the cinema, since the formation of Finas in 1980, yet, nothing substantial
has happened.
And the ministers concerned did not care to ask specific and pertinent questions because they too were not sure what they could do with Finas and what to expect from them and the officials who seem to be very busy going all over the world attending film festivals and markets without ever benefiting the industry.
And they
are selfish and want to guard their own status quo because they fear those who
are better qualified and formally trained would overshadow them in case if they
become prominent filmmakers that have managed to get international recognition
for their works.
In the
end, Finas loses and the country loses, and the specter of the 13 May, 1969
Incident continues to loom over the country, and unfortunately, the aftershocks
had been felt over the years with the latest one happening over a cellphone at
an IT center in the city center.
This
incident could have easily been avoided if those in authority knew what to do
with Finas and get those who are with this national film agency to work hard to
establish and develop the New Malaysian Cinema and get those involved in the
film industry to produce films which are in pursuit of the New Malaysian Dream.
Comments