CHARLIE HEBDO OF PARIS AND CHARLIE CHAN OF HOLLYWOOD
…AND THE
ONE MILLION IN THE UNITY MARCH IN PARIS (TO NOWHERE), LED BY HOLLANDE AND SOME
OTHER EUROPEAN LEADERS…
By
Mansor Puteh
This is
what is happening in Paris and France in recent times; the French had
discovered that their own definition and concept of the Freedom of Speech and
Expression to be wanting and it is not perfect.
This is
what the whole of France
and the world did not see; they refused to see it because their eyes are
blinkered; they are too close to the happenings that they had all failed to be
intellectual and realistic or real.
All of
them are thinking of Charlie Hebdo of Paris and
none of them seemed to be aware of Charlie Chan of Hollywood . Both the Charlies are in the same
boat, involved in the same issues and controversies.
Charlie
Chan is ‘dead’, long live Charlie Hebdo…?
And the
National Front of France leader Marien le Pen was not invited to attend the
march in Paris
so she had to organize one her own elsewhere? Long live, ‘Liberte, Egalite and
Fraternite’ (Liberty ,
Equality and Fraternity)??
Yet, Charlie
Hebdo cartoonists did not consider these national slogans or philosophy when
they decided to make fun of the Prophet knocking off ‘Equalite and Fraternate’
as they pleased.
Yet, still,
no one in Paris and France
and America and Europe has got the connection. They prefer to play the
blame game with the television stations preferring to secure street-level views
on the matter; they won’t be able to see anything beyond what their brains can
tell them.
They are
very angry with themselves that they have not embraced universalism and are
finding themselves to have erred, to a disastrous effect causing the untimely
death of some of their own kind.
But alas
it is not too late, as they had also found out. Now they marched to show to the
world that they have been wrong all these years that their government and
military cannot engage in international expeditions without facing backlash at
home and in Paris .
Charlie
Hebdo became the scapegoat for the errors committed by the French and their
government for intentionally wanting to mess around in the Middle East and Africa where they did not belong after the country was
pushed out of them by the anti-colonialist forces in the relevant countries.
Did the
French watch Charlie Chan, television serial and film produced by Hollywood earlier?
If they
had then surely, Charlie Hebdo might have got some valuable lessons from
them.
Yet no
one carried the offending caricature of the Prophet or a copy of the Charlie
Hebdo magazine during the March of Unity or Unity March in Paris on Sunday, 11 January, 2015! Why??
…Why are
they so scared to do that to prove that they believe in their version of the
Freedom of Speech and Expression They only dared to carry short pencils and
placards in French.
In America ,
Hollywood studios which are very powerful too had to bend to accommodate
backlash, i.e. concerning Charlie Chan, the Chinese character which they had
created which many Chinese today find to be offensive.
Maybe
Charlie Chan films were not banned; they were just taken out by the Hollywood
studios that created them because they did not want to offend anyone especially
the Chinese in America
and the rest of the world.
There are no Charlie Chan film repeats on television or a remake of the film by anyone even if the main character will be played by a Chinese actor from China or Hong Kong instead of a white American passing and made up to look Chinese.
CNN says
there were a few hundred thousands who attended the Unity March in Paris , on Sunday, 11
January, 2015.
The other international television news networks have other figures ranging from more than one million to one and a half million people.
Le
Monde, the newspaper in Paris
said there were more than two million.
But from
what I can see on television, I can safely say that there were not more than
half a million people or less.
And the
only question I kept asking myself as the march moves on slowly was: Where were
they marching to?
No, I am
not talking about the march starting from Place de la Republique to Place de la
Nation, which is a short distance for the guests and people to do.
But what
are they trying to prove?
They say they are protecting Freedom of Speech and Expression, and insist that the people in Charlie Hebdo were right in doing what they had done even to the expense of surrendering their lives.
Yet,
there was none of the international leaders and those in the half a million
crowd had bothered to carry a dated issue of the magazine much less one bearing
the caricatures of the Prophet.
A
magazine in Hamburg in Germany was
quick in republishing the caricatures, and their office was quick to be
firebombed.
No one
was hurt in the fire attack, since the office was closed after office hours, or
attention would be refocused on them from the office of Charlie Hebdo in Paris , especially if there were some of the Hamburg magazine had
died.
What
were the political elected leaders and those in the crowd afraid of? They were
so many of them and no one would dare hurt them.
They
were also on live television.
The most disgusting part were the comments made by some of them in the crowd and those whose views and opinions were solicited by the staff of the television stations including their own.
Fareed
Zakaria and Christianne Amanpour’s views on the matter are passable and
predictable; they are not original or intelligent.
The
French government now under President Francois Hollande must start the march
again to the point when they are the most smart and intelligent and not emotional.
If they can do that, they can give justice to themselves, the French population and the rest of the world.
Maybe Hollywood and the French government must allow Charlie
Chan to be shown on French television, if this television serial is not offensive
to the Chinese and see what the average Chinese-French citizens would say to
that, and what the Chinese in China ,
Taiwan and Hong
Kong and elsewhere will react to that.
And
Charlie Hebdo should also print tee-shirts and postcards bearing the caricatures
that their dead cartoonists had created and sell them to see just how many
French people would buy them and also to wear the tee-shirts and to whom they
would send the postcards to.
Charlie
Chan is ‘dead’, long live Charlie Hebdo…?
Comments