THE UNITED NATIONS A THREAT TO WORLD PEACE. IT IS BAD FOR MUSLIMS:

…THE PERMANENT MEMBERS OF THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL PROTECT PEOPLE OF ALL THE OTHER RELIGIONS AND THE ATHEISTS, BUT NOT ISLAM AND MUSLIMS WHO ARE NOT BEING TREATED AS HUMANS BY THE UN.
By Mansor Puteh



Countries that demand veto power are those that do not practice democracy. This is despite their insistence that they are supporters of democracy. They are not.

And veto powers have been used against countries which some of the permanent members of the Security Council had used on helpless nations.

So they do not bring benefit to the UN and its members. They are only for some of its more ridiculous members of the Security Council to abuse.

The permanent membership of the Security Council must be dissolved or its number increased to ensure that Muslims especially are protected and offered similar rights as those of the other religions and the atheists.

That’s the reason why they were so reluctant to admit the Organization of Islamic Council (OIC) as a permanent member of the Security Council which also has veto powers like the other six member-countries.

The composition of the six permanent members of the United Nations (UN) is telling. They represent the countries and religions other than Islam. So no wonder Muslims have been persecuted because they have been left vulnerable to political chess games by some of its more ridiculous members, especially America. And this has been happening for decades.

Imagine: The Muslim World with more than 1.5 billion people who are the majority in 57 Muslim countries and who are present in large numbers in all the others, including America and Israel.

Yet, the Muslims are not represented in this group, to make it a group of seven.

The other permanent members know as long as the Muslims are not one of its members, they do not have veto power that they can use all the time to protect themselves and their interests, and they would have to depend on the charity of some of the more friendly countries, especially China and Russia.

Without these two countries, more Muslim countries and its people would have been persecuted by the more vicious members of the UN. 

So one can easily come up with the suspicion which is not totally unfounded by saying that the root cause of all of the world’s problems is the UN Security Council, or more specifically its permanent members.

What’s so outrageous with this suspicion or charge?

And it is also ironic that the UN has other international agencies especially UNICEF which provides humanitarian aid to member-countries which suffer calamities and wars. Yet, its parent organization provides the world with such calamities and wars.

Even now many are not spared.

Comments