WHY AMERICA HAS A SMALL FEDERAL CABINET OF FIFTEEN MINISTRIES AND NO MINISTRY OF YOUTH AND SPORTS?
MALAYSIA A SMALLER COUNTRY HAS TWENTY-SEVEN MINISTRIES AND
HOW TO FREE MOST OF THEM TO PAVE THE WAY FOR MALAYSIA TO BE A DEVELOPED COUNTRY!
By
Mansor bin Puteh
(Mansor
Puteh is one of the three top blood donors who had donated blood 511 times and
was given a special donor certificate by the Minister of Health, and signed by
Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohammad yesterday, 3 November.
He
studied for his Masters of Fine Art in Film Directing at Columbia University
and have presented papers and given lectures in universities in various
countries that touch not only on film or the arts but international politics.
He was invited
to be a member of the international observers’ team to monitor the Syrian
Presidential Election in June, 2014.
He also
traveled by land from Los Angeles to New York City during the November, 2016
American presidential election.)
Does the
size of the cabinet matter to make America to be what it is today? And how
Malaysia can learn much from how America could have such a small number of
ministries in their Federal Cabinet.
American
which has a population of three hundred million people whose political and
military and economic reach extends throughout the world only has a total of
fifteen ministries.
Whereas
Malaysia which has a total population of only thirty-two people has
twenty-seven ministries including the ministry of youth and sports that America
does not even have.
Yet,
despite that sports in America has brought out the best from many Americans so
that they have sports activities that are conducted not by any ministry but by
associations and other private individuals.
And does
Malaysia need to maintain such a large number of ministries to ensure that all
sectors of government and the private sector be enhanced? This unfortunately,
has not happened.
Unfortunately,
since the country first had its own government in 1955 with its first cabinet
which comprised only seven cabinet members, it has grown to twenty-seven. The
number might increase if demands from organizations and groups are answered.
In fact,
if we look at some other developed countries we can see that most have only
fifteen ministries in their cabinets; and from the looks of it if Malaysia
wants to aspire to become a developed country, it too must start to trim down
the size of the cabinet to at the most fifteen.
Many of
the ministries have become redundant over the years, and what need is there for
the continued existence of the Ministry of Youth and Sports anyway?
From
1955 when Malaysia had its own government, the country has spent billions for
each ministry till now and each time there is a budget presentation in
parliament, the ministers and senior officers in the respective ministries
would applaud and hit the table in parliament if they receive a larger
allocation than in the previous years.
This
should not happen; on the contrary, they all should feel ashamed because the
need for their ministry to be given or allocated a larger sum for the next
year’s budget only proves that they had not done well in the previous year or
years, to force them to seek and hence, get a larger allocation for the next
year.
If the
ministers in the first cabinet of 1955 or the next group of ministers under
then Prime Minister Tunku Abdul Rahman had been smart, they all should have
allocated a small sum of money to engage experts or train some Malayans and
Malaysians, to be sent to the right universities in England and America to
study how some strategic industries in these countries and other developed
ones, too, had managed to be what they are so that they could become
independent of any government control or the need for them to seek subsidies or
allocations from their governments each year.
Sports
in America, especially had become a huge industry, so that in time, the country
did not see why it was necessary for them to have a specific ministry for
sports, anyway.
America,
too had its Hollywood and Broadway that were created and developed and expanded
to be what they are today, even before America gained its independence from
Britain to be an independent Union on 4 July, 1776.
So no
wonder, even today, the American cabinet which also has their ministries for
information and culture with their respective Secretaries, do not have
ministries that are dependent on the federal government for subsidies and
allocations like the film industry and theater activities in Malaysia that
still do.
Therefore
it is even ironic that the Malaysian government had to establish the Finas Act
of 1981 to establish a film industry which till now demands to be given more
and more financial allocations each year and with each sitting of parliament
when the Budget Speech is given by the minister of finance (MOF) which
unfortunately, did not have any for 2019.
The real
problem concerning Finas is because the draft of the bill was written by
officers in the Attorney-General’s Office who were not trained in film and who
had been ordered to study the film industry in America known as Hollywood and
its related activities including theater known as Broadway, to know how to
draft the bill in the first place.
So till
now even after thirty-seven years, Finas is still a government-dependent agency
under the Ministry of Information and Multimedia or Kementerian Komunikasi dan
Multimedia (KKMM) which seeks to be given more and more financial allocation,
when in fact, it should have been turned into a large government organization
or even a Government-Linked Company or GLC that offers the government revenue
in return and be free of any ministerial interference like Hollywood and
Broadway.
And the
development of the film industry in Malaysia can also cause the act to create a
national theater much like Broadway in America and West End in the United
Kingdom, whose existence and history we could have learnt much from and caused
theatrical activities in Malaysia to also be free from the Ministry of Culture
and Tourism (Motac).
The
worse irony of it all is that with more ministries in the Malaysian Cabinet,
there is more politicking and less work being done to develop all the agencies
and activities that are under their care as can be seen in the daily activities
of its ministers and deputy ministers and senior officers which are mostly
social in character purely for public relations benefits to them and their
ministries.
And the
fact that none of the agencies and activities in any of the ministries had been
freed from the ministerial control to be independent commercial activities and
endeavors prove that all these years, the members of the Malaysian Cabinet had
not gone beyond their call of duty to ensure that this happened, so in time all
the agencies and activities can become industries of their own.
Maybe it
is not too late for the ministries especially the Ministry of Culture and
Tourism (Motac) and Ministry of Information and Multimedia (KKMM) to engage
some experts to conduct research for them who can then offer a new plan for the
fresh development of the film and theater industries in Malaysia to be created
and developed so that in time.
And they
can in years to come become income-generating industries that can in the final
analysis and irony, cause the influence of the ministries to become redundant
much like those in America where their Secretaries of Information and of
Culture and even of Education and what else, do not have much of a public
profile or social activities to trust their personal image to the American
public and whose work is conducted mostly in private and quietly with no
fanfare or self-adulation or self-aggrandizement.
Comments
Of course, the UK has only to contend with a single well loved royal house and Brunei is too anglophilic to be used as an example.
Yes, I agree with you, Mansor Bin Putih, the overly manned cabinet is sadly one that is only cari makan ministers and aides.