MAHATHIR IS DEFINITELY WRONG ON THE ‘FOUNDING’ OF SINGAPORE…
By Mansor Puteh
Dr Mahathir Mohammad said it was the Temenggung of
Johor and not Sultan Ali, who had signed off the island to the British that had
allowed it to become a republic that it is today. It is far from the truth.
He was responding to the comments which the Sultan
of Johor, Sultan Ibrahim had said about him and his comments on Forest City
that is being jointly developed by some Chinese concerns.
But the area that will be developed is not in Johor
proper, but off-shore on land that will be reclaimed, which Mahathir has said
would hold seven hundred thousand people mostly those from China .
And this, to Mahathir, amounts to surrendering the
sovereignty of the state of Johor to the Chinese of China.
Unfortunately, what Mahathir has said was culled
from reports from Bloomberg, and not from official sources, so his statements
could implicate himself as well as the international news agency.
As for Mahathir’s comments on how he had alleged that
it was the Temenggung of Johor who had caused the island of Singapore to be
surrendered to the British and not Sultan Ali, one can surmise that he did not
do an adequate investigation on this aspect of the history of Johor and the
so-called founding of Singapore by Stamford Raffles on 31 January, 1818.
Mahathir, to his disadvantage, did not say the
Temenggug’s full name which is Temenggung Abdul Rahman and Sultan Ali’s full
name which is Sultan Ali Iskandar.
This may be proof that Dr Mahathir Mohammad does
not know everything and not everything he says is right or the truth.
I wish to correct Mahathir who says it was Sultan
Ali who refused to sign away the island
of Singapore to the British which
prompted the Temenggong of Johor to agree to do it, thus causing Singapore to be
an independent and also now a developed country thus allowing Johor to lose the
island.
How
could he have made such a glaring mistake?
Unfortunately,
no one had come up to correct him on this, simply because not many know the exact
history of the so-called founding of Singapore by Thomas Stamford
Raffles.
But
again, it was not a country for the British that Raffles had come to Singapore
to found but to for them to be allowed to establish a mere ‘trading post’, with
no intention of turning the island into a British colony, let alone a new
country.
I have
written a historical novel called ‘Hussain and the story of an island…’ which
is on this episode so I know just a bit more on the matter and can even teach
Mahathir on how historically and factually incorrect his statement was.
Sultan Ali as mentioned by Mahathir was Sultan Ali
Iskandar, was the son of Sultan Hussain Shah (Raja Hussain Shah a.k.a. Tengku
Long) that Stamford Raffles had cajoled and encouraged to leave his hiding
place so he could be installed the first Sultan of Singapura (sic) on the
Padang in Singapura on the 31 January, 1819 with due recognition as the sovereign
head of the new country.
Sultan Ali Iskandar was not even born in that year.
‘Let it be it known to
all men that the governor-general of India Lord Hastings has appointed his
highness Raja Hussain Shah to be first Sultan of Singapore and all the
territories comprised in it, with the title of Sultan Hussain Muazzam Shah ibni Al-Marhum Sultan Mahmud on
this day of the Thirty-first day of January, in the year of 1819,’ read the English officer.
Unfortunately, when Raffles left Singapura, he was
succeeded by William Farquhar did not treat him well thus causing Sultan
Hussain to sulk (merajuk).
And on 5
June, 1834, he and his family fled Singapore on the ship ‘Julia’ belonging to
the Sultan of Kedah, and arrived in Melaka five days later on 11 June, to live
in exile for the second time in his life.
Sultan Hussain did not stay in Melaka long because he
soon died on 5 September, 1835 at the age of fifty-eight years and waa
succeeded by his eldest son, Tengku Ali Iskandar who was only fifteen.
Unfortunately, the
British did not recognize Sultan Hussain's successor, as an
evil strategy,and in due course Singapore was colonized by the British.
And he left behind his
four wives, Cik Wok binti Cik Sulaiman Chabang, Tengku Perbu binti Tengku Mamat, Che
Puan Engku Bulang binti Engku Muda Ahmad and Wan Aishah or Engku Daeng Aishah
binti Tun Koris.
Therefore, Singapore Island was not given by
Sultan Hussain Shah or the Temenggung Abdul Rahman to the British but Johor was
cheated by the British to part with it, and in due course brought in people
from China do render the Melayu population, the minority.
*
* * * * * *
It would be interesting if a film on this
episode is produced and shown worldwide so many people will know the tragedy
that had befallen Sultan Hussain Shah and how he and the Melayu were cheated by
the British who conned them into parting with their land, which caused the
establishment of a small stamp-sized country in Southeast Asia otherwise known
as the Nusantara Melayu or Melayu World.
And why not? I has a lot of elements that
not many films that had been produced even by Hollywood , with a theme which is still
relevant today. And it can be a world hit, if it done well and marketed
properly.
It is just unfortunate that the film
producers and directors and actors are not familiar with the colorful history
of the so-called founding of Singapore
to realize its potential.
Maybe somebody would realize it soon, and do
something about it.
We can’t expect those in Hollywood or even
England to take the initiative to produce such a film, and chances are for any
Malaysian producer to be brave enough to want to do it are bleak as most of
them are not aware of the episode.
Comments