DISADVANTAGES OF THE VERNACULAR MANDARIN AND TAMIL SCHOOLS….AND WHO DOMINATES THE CRIMES SECTOR IN MALAYSIA.
…BUT WHY ARE THE CHINESE IN HONG
KONG NOT DOING AWAY WITH THE VERNACULAR SCHOOLS AND HAVE THE
ENGLISH ONES INSTEAD THERE?
By Mansor Puteh
Dr Martin Luther King must surely be shocked and
will roll in his grave if he hears of the minorities in Malaysia who were sent
to Tanah Melayu by the British as no more but the equivalent of SLAVES to
support their decadent colonial system, who are now free but who insist on
having their separate schools, the vernacular schools where Mandarin and Tamil
are the mediums of instruction.
Even then it is Mandarin and Tamil but not the
other Chinese or Indian dialects, because their numbers are small so they could
not demand for similar schools in Cantonese or Malayam, Telugu and Urdu, etc.
So this is the main factor, number, which had
caused the Chinese and Indian community and political leaders to be able to use
their political leverage that the Melayu majority had surrendered to them,
because they were fractured and turning the Chinese and Indians as the
unnecessary kingmakers.
If the Chinese and Indians had used their cool
heads earlier on then surely, the vernacular schools would have not come into
existence.
Here is a photo of a group of non-Melayu I chanced
seeing at a national school or sekolah Melayu, and whose parents had made the
right decisions to send their children to this school and not to the vernacular
Mandarin and Tamil ones.
There are many other national schools in Malaysia
that have large numbers of non-Melayu students; and they seem to be happy
living with each other unencumbered by unnecessary social, cultural, religious
strife; and who will grow up much like the open-minded Chinese and Indians who
are easy to mix with the Melayu majority and enjoying life because they have
balance which those with the vernacular schooling backgrounds do not have.
And this is the main reason for the existence of
the Chinese parties especially the DAP to continue to exist because they are
given the boost with the existence of the vernacular schools that are
ironically also supported by the government.
And what do those students with vernacular
schooling backgrounds do if they drop out of school after Standard Six or Form
Three do?
They can’t be absorbed into the private sector, government sector, so they have to enter the Crimes Sector, by doing odd-jobs and especially pasting illegal stickers everywhere and for the Indians, stealing metals especially manholes…with those who have better morals opting to drive cabs or to operate stalls in the night markets.
You can bet those Chinese and Indian students with
the national schooling backgrounds won’t be able to do such things because they
have better moral values and better education.
And why are the Chinese in Malaysia are not insisting that their brethren
in Hong Kong which was also under British
colonial rule for so long do away with the vernacular schools with Cantonese as
the medium of instruction and have the English schools instead?
They are in the majority there so they can decide
to have such schools. But they were not interested to have them. They only have
the Cantonese schools.
And how many Hong Kongers are able to speak in
English well? Not many.
In Malaysia
many Chinese insist on having the English language schools saying that they are
more superior and better to the Melayu ones, because their main idea is to do
away with the Melayu schools where they could not excel in and to degrade the
national language.
Unfortunately the problem arises when there is a
substantial number of Chinese who had been given a lot of leg-up to succeed in
the economic that they had become less subtle and also coarse in their
language, especially those in political.
And in Malaysia, this can be allowed because of the
division of the Melayu so that the Chinese can cause harm to their unity to
benefit from it and in the process too push their language agenda and with the
advertising industry being controlled by them they have slowly caused the wider
use of the Melayu language, with even some Melayu claiming that the language to
be inferior and the schools too should be turned into English language ones
like what he had before.
But that was during the British administration of Malaya . This is another story.
One of the main reasons why the Melayu wanted the
British out was also because the wanted to have less or no English in the
country which some Chinese are still demanding today with the lame excuses that
they could think of simply because they could not push for the wider use of
Mandarin in the country which even a Chinese-dominated country like Singapore
are not wont to accept fully.
And why are those Chinese and Indians who favor and
support the continued existence of the vernacular schools are silent on the
matter when it comes to the way the Chinese and Tamils are treated in other
countries especially in America, the United Kingdom and the others in Europe
that do not give them any inch to what they claim they would need, being
citizens of the countries and who should also demand to be given the same
treatment as what their brethren have been given in Malaysia all this while?
Most of the time, they would use those countries in
the West as their gauge to support whatever claims however dubious and
inconsequential they may be, and if those countries have things that are useful
to them, they praise them.
But on the question of the vernacular schools,
those countries do not have anything to do with them; and yet the Chinese and
Tamil there do not demand for them to be established.
They can demand to be allowed to build their
temples and Chinatowns and Little Indias
wherever they want, but in terms of education, their demands cannot and will
not be met.
Comments