HOW COULD ANYONE NOT KNOW HE WAS NOT SODOMIZED?
…WHO WOULD WANT TO ADMIT TO HAVING SODOMIZED ANYONE WHEN
THEY KNOW THAT THE PUNISHMENT IS SEVERE?
By Mansor Puteh
I don’t think there is any male person in the world, and especially in Malaysia, in his right mind, who would find it interesting or pleasant to file a charge against another male person for sodomizing him, especially if the person who accuses it, says that he had been sodomized few times and at different places, even if his anus does not show it in medical examinations, because that sometimes happen. It exposes him to ridicule and contempt and even physical harm.
There are not many men these days who would readily admit to having sodomized another man because they know the horrific judgment that he can expect it he is brave enough to admit it.
So he will go at great lengths to deny, condemn and even ridicule the man who had pressed charges against him, as this is the only tool that he now has. The other being to garner public sympathy and getting the public to make the final judgment, when they are blind to the real facts.
This is an old trick, which had been used in the past, but which can never be repeated, although the problem is still the same.
At the same time, there could be scars in the anus but it could be due to constipation. So the doctors who write the report really has a chance of manipulating it, even though he may not be too certain why had caused the anus of the said person to be so scarred.
It is, therefore, not be very difficult for him to prove that he had been sodomized.
Because he has many things to back his charge, since it involves many elements and the physical activities of two persons whose movements can be traced and tracked.
Surely, he would know that he had been sodomized and there were dialogue exchanges leading to the first incident, which could be expressed and related to, which one could not create.
All these can lead to an easy conviction of the sodomist who can still insist on being innocent, while serving sentence in jail, if he has political mileage to be claimed by default, as there are many sympathizers who are willing to side with him no matter what.
Because it is impossible for two male persons regardless of whether they are Malays and Muslims or not, and who can get into some form of understanding without having had created the communication and understanding and special relationship prior to the first incident.
And there is foreplay and the small talks.
Former Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos, who was alleged by an American woman for having sex with him, first denied the charge. But later he relented when the woman provided proof in the form of his underwear and pubic hair – which could not be available to anyone who did not have any intimate relationship with him. They could only be got from his bedroom.
Another man was convicted for rape when the woman related the shape and length of the rapist’s penis.
This could even be worse for the rapist of sodomist if he has warts on his penis that could be described and be seen only by someone who had intimate relationship with him.
So the American woman was smart in keeping and saving these proofs, which gave her added advantage.
One man who was charged for rape escaped because the accused said the person who had raped her was someone who had bad body odor, which he did not.
But body odor can be changed according to the circumstances a person is in.
If a person is intent on raping someone, then it will be good for him not to have a pleasant body odor. A bad one is very convenient, since he can smell like many people, unlike the sweet smell of male deodorants which can be detected and can be used to convict a person.
Even young children have been known to remember if they had been molested, and whose charge had been taken seriously by the authorities, who later managed to find ample and incontrovertible evidence to convict the molesters concerned, and this could happen decades earlier, as what some of those young boys who charged some Catholic priests in America for molesting them for which the Church in the country had to pay compensation involving scores of millions of American dollars.
But in this regard, at least the priests and church had the sense and remorse to admit guilt and not protest their innocence to kingdom come, and get as many lawyers who could benefit from their case by taking it all the way to the Federal Court, and taking many years, while they make lots of income from it.
Lawyers are known for dragging cases and giving their clients false therapy by insisting that they could win cases even though they and their clients know that they are guilty from day one, because the lawyers can benefit financially from the exercise since it often becomes a high profile case.
So what more if the case involves adults who should be more in control of the faculties?
And chances of a conviction for sodomy are high because there are many elements and factors involved all of which could draw attention to the actual acts being committed.
Worse, in the present world of high technology, there could even be secret video recording that the accuser may have made, which could be disclosed at a later stage in the trial, which is purely aimed at shocking the judges and court, and worse, the accused, if he has been freed of all the charges.
Any cheap cellphone can be used for audio and even visual recording which can be used in court to support the charge leveled against the rapist or sodomist.
But at the same time, it will also not be difficult for the person who is charged for sodomizing him to deny the charge as it is a natural reaction, considering the sentence to be grave. Admitting to the charge can only give him a lesser sentence, which may still be very harsh, especially if the person is considered to be reputable, and who has grand schemes for the nation and the world.
Take a lie detector test!
Would the accused and his accuser be brave enough to first of all, take a lie detector test? It may not be the most perfect way to determine if he had sodomized anyone, but at least this can show what they might have done.
Other than that, the accused can also be subjected to hypnotism, which can also bring out the secret thoughts which he could manage to suppress, especially if he are cunning and shrewd and who have a group of eager lawyers defending him, regardless of whether they know he is guilty or not because their mission is to save the accused from any conviction.
What other alibis can an accused person provide the court that can convince the judge to free him of all the charges if he is charged of sodomy?
There are quite a few. Some of them had already been used successfully, so they cannot be used again because they are not original anymore.
In today’s age, there are many other ways that can be used to condemn a person for a crime he has committed for which he steadfastly refuse to admit doing.
So chances of a person who has indeed committed a crime of this nature to escape persecution are really limited; he can only delay proceedings and bring a host of things to the court purely to delay his ultimate conviction.
THEY KNOW THAT THE PUNISHMENT IS SEVERE?
By Mansor Puteh
I don’t think there is any male person in the world, and especially in Malaysia, in his right mind, who would find it interesting or pleasant to file a charge against another male person for sodomizing him, especially if the person who accuses it, says that he had been sodomized few times and at different places, even if his anus does not show it in medical examinations, because that sometimes happen. It exposes him to ridicule and contempt and even physical harm.
There are not many men these days who would readily admit to having sodomized another man because they know the horrific judgment that he can expect it he is brave enough to admit it.
So he will go at great lengths to deny, condemn and even ridicule the man who had pressed charges against him, as this is the only tool that he now has. The other being to garner public sympathy and getting the public to make the final judgment, when they are blind to the real facts.
This is an old trick, which had been used in the past, but which can never be repeated, although the problem is still the same.
At the same time, there could be scars in the anus but it could be due to constipation. So the doctors who write the report really has a chance of manipulating it, even though he may not be too certain why had caused the anus of the said person to be so scarred.
It is, therefore, not be very difficult for him to prove that he had been sodomized.
Because he has many things to back his charge, since it involves many elements and the physical activities of two persons whose movements can be traced and tracked.
Surely, he would know that he had been sodomized and there were dialogue exchanges leading to the first incident, which could be expressed and related to, which one could not create.
All these can lead to an easy conviction of the sodomist who can still insist on being innocent, while serving sentence in jail, if he has political mileage to be claimed by default, as there are many sympathizers who are willing to side with him no matter what.
Because it is impossible for two male persons regardless of whether they are Malays and Muslims or not, and who can get into some form of understanding without having had created the communication and understanding and special relationship prior to the first incident.
And there is foreplay and the small talks.
Former Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos, who was alleged by an American woman for having sex with him, first denied the charge. But later he relented when the woman provided proof in the form of his underwear and pubic hair – which could not be available to anyone who did not have any intimate relationship with him. They could only be got from his bedroom.
Another man was convicted for rape when the woman related the shape and length of the rapist’s penis.
This could even be worse for the rapist of sodomist if he has warts on his penis that could be described and be seen only by someone who had intimate relationship with him.
So the American woman was smart in keeping and saving these proofs, which gave her added advantage.
One man who was charged for rape escaped because the accused said the person who had raped her was someone who had bad body odor, which he did not.
But body odor can be changed according to the circumstances a person is in.
If a person is intent on raping someone, then it will be good for him not to have a pleasant body odor. A bad one is very convenient, since he can smell like many people, unlike the sweet smell of male deodorants which can be detected and can be used to convict a person.
Even young children have been known to remember if they had been molested, and whose charge had been taken seriously by the authorities, who later managed to find ample and incontrovertible evidence to convict the molesters concerned, and this could happen decades earlier, as what some of those young boys who charged some Catholic priests in America for molesting them for which the Church in the country had to pay compensation involving scores of millions of American dollars.
But in this regard, at least the priests and church had the sense and remorse to admit guilt and not protest their innocence to kingdom come, and get as many lawyers who could benefit from their case by taking it all the way to the Federal Court, and taking many years, while they make lots of income from it.
Lawyers are known for dragging cases and giving their clients false therapy by insisting that they could win cases even though they and their clients know that they are guilty from day one, because the lawyers can benefit financially from the exercise since it often becomes a high profile case.
So what more if the case involves adults who should be more in control of the faculties?
And chances of a conviction for sodomy are high because there are many elements and factors involved all of which could draw attention to the actual acts being committed.
Worse, in the present world of high technology, there could even be secret video recording that the accuser may have made, which could be disclosed at a later stage in the trial, which is purely aimed at shocking the judges and court, and worse, the accused, if he has been freed of all the charges.
Any cheap cellphone can be used for audio and even visual recording which can be used in court to support the charge leveled against the rapist or sodomist.
But at the same time, it will also not be difficult for the person who is charged for sodomizing him to deny the charge as it is a natural reaction, considering the sentence to be grave. Admitting to the charge can only give him a lesser sentence, which may still be very harsh, especially if the person is considered to be reputable, and who has grand schemes for the nation and the world.
Take a lie detector test!
Would the accused and his accuser be brave enough to first of all, take a lie detector test? It may not be the most perfect way to determine if he had sodomized anyone, but at least this can show what they might have done.
Other than that, the accused can also be subjected to hypnotism, which can also bring out the secret thoughts which he could manage to suppress, especially if he are cunning and shrewd and who have a group of eager lawyers defending him, regardless of whether they know he is guilty or not because their mission is to save the accused from any conviction.
What other alibis can an accused person provide the court that can convince the judge to free him of all the charges if he is charged of sodomy?
There are quite a few. Some of them had already been used successfully, so they cannot be used again because they are not original anymore.
In today’s age, there are many other ways that can be used to condemn a person for a crime he has committed for which he steadfastly refuse to admit doing.
So chances of a person who has indeed committed a crime of this nature to escape persecution are really limited; he can only delay proceedings and bring a host of things to the court purely to delay his ultimate conviction.
Comments