MALAYSIAN DIASPORA FILMS AND MAY BE JUST A BIT OF ‘LAT’ IS NEEDED TO RESHAPE THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE NEW MALAYSIAN CINEMA
…AND
ALSO UNDO THE STEREOTYPES CREATED BY THE OLD MALAYAN CINEMA.
By
Mansor Puteh
Most
film directors in Malaysia
seem to have got it wrong.
They tried their level best using whatever ingenuity to come up with films which they thought would be what the general population wanted with the littlest or nonexistent formal education and some experience, copying from films they had seen earlier and coming up with their own in almost similar style that show their lack for concern for originality and creativity.
Their
guesses were all wrong.
This
also encouraged some Chinese and Tamil directors to try their luck coming up
with films that deal with the Chinese and Tamil Diasporas, which unfortunately
also did not quite make it even in China, Hong Kong, Taiwan and India where
local issues are the main concerns of their filmmakers.
Their
films could only take them so far, but not far enough after it had been
revealed to be a mere gimmick used by the producers to attract the attention of
the film festivals in the Chinese and Indian countries and also amongst the
Chinese and Indian Diaspora around the world.
The problem is that their films in such a class of Chinese and Indian or Tamil Diaspora films can only be liked by certain international film festivals, but not the others, especially the major studios to want to bring such films to the bigger screen for the wider audiences including those in
And China too does
not feel encouraged with the creation of such films; to them they show not
Chinese Diaspora, but Chinese Displacement.
The sight of the Chinese living in such a deplorable condition is sickening. Not many inChina
want to see such films about their own kind living anywhere else in the world,
where they are not able to assimilate well with the locals or natives there.
The sight of the Chinese living in such a deplorable condition is sickening. Not many in
Indian
or Tamil Diaspora films suffer worse reception even by the Indians anywhere in
the world, more so in India
where fantasy films reign with fantastic settings and plots that most of the
time go beyond common sense or logic.
When their production comes to Langkawi in
No one
wondered how the crook in their film could come all the way to Malaysia and take the trouble of going to
Langkawi only to continue fighting with his persuer who is a police officer in India .
Maybe
Melayu Diaspora films could be a nice and welcoming attraction to many of the
Melayu viewers in Malaysia .
But so
far no such film has been produced. The problem being that the Melayu Diaspora
is not like the Chinese and Indian Diasporas, who are fractured and who prefer
to be on their own; where they are no MelayuTowns in any major world city.
So the theme on isolation and personal angst can become a good theme for Malaysian filmmakers to deal with i.e. if they know how to grapple with the subject to make it convincing and not looking like it is also a copy of another film he had seen earlier without dwelling too much on cultural shock and isolation as the main theme of the stories.
If this
can be done and with the films that have cross-cultural and interdisplinary
experiences, then surely, they can be accepted better not only abroad but in
the country where it matters more, although getting recognition abroad of the
artistic and creative kind would be good too.
Even
then Malaysian filmmakers seem to have been looking elsewhere, and not at the
right place.
And no wonder they have also not been looked at as serious filmmakers who are sensitive that try to capture and record the different times that the country has moved from, and is heading for.
This is
because they have not been looking at the right place, at some of Lat’s
cartoons to get some interesting ideas from.
Film
director, Othman Hafsham had tried his level best to come up with ‘Mekanik’
which became a surprise hit when it was shown in the early 1980s.
He had
created a spark here but unfortunately, he and the others in his generation had
not managed or are capable of igniting the spark to create a new wave of films
that we can proudly claim to be the New Malaysian Cinema.
It was
not Hafsham to be blamed; he was just a film director.
Those who could be blamed are the think-tankers, the philosophers, historians, psychologists, sociologists and politicians who could not come up to pick up from where he had left.
And Finas, too, must accept most of the blame for being too disengaged from this new and exciting development which happened when the national film agency was established in 1981.
If Finas
had done something to embrace this development surely something magical could
have happened to the film industry in the country that could lead to the
creation of the New Malaysian Cinema.
Unfortunately,
those at Finas then only knew how to embrace past achievements of those in the
Old Malayan Cinema who they considered needed to be further given the necessary
attention and tribute.
They did
this at the expense of the new generation of Malaysian filmmakers who were
eager to contribute many things to help develop the film industry, but they
ended up being pitted against the old generation of filmmakers instead.
And for
the past first three decade since its existence Finas has failed to see the
creation of any interesting film, much less to encourage anyone of their
filmmakers to bring back the coveted Oscars, or any other minor awards for
their works.
But none
of these have been recorded in films.
In fact, most of the scenes that are created because of the vast economic development which even saw Kuala Lumpur looking totally different than it was in the early 1980s have been missed because the directors and producers of feature films and television drama serials only focus on the few major scenes for their productions, such as the bedroom, inside of a moving car and hotel coffeehouses.
Alas,
all these are not captured in films, as Malaysian filmmakers look elsewhere and
with that the international film festivals, too, look elsewhere…
Comments